Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

61 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Genital chlamydia prevalence in Europe and non-European high income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Redmond SM, Alexander-Kisslig K, Woodhall SC, van den Broek IV, van Bergen J, Ward H, Uusküla A, Herrmann B, Andersen B, Götz HM, Sfetcu O, Low N. Redmond SM, et al. Among authors: van den broek iv, van bergen j. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 23;10(1):e0115753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115753. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25615574 Free PMC article. Review.
Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysis.
van den Broek IV, Hoebe CJ, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, de Feijter EM, Fennema JS, Götz HM, Koekenbier RH, van Ravesteijn SM, de Coul EL. van den Broek IV, et al. Among authors: van bergen je, van ravesteijn sm. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Apr 7;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-89. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20374635 Free PMC article.
Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the Netherlands.
van Bergen JE, Fennema JS, van den Broek IV, Brouwers EE, de Feijter EM, Hoebe CJ, Koekenbier RH, de Coul EL, van Ravesteijn SM, Götz HM. van Bergen JE, et al. Among authors: van den broek iv, van ravesteijn sm. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Oct 7;10:293. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-293. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20925966 Free PMC article.
Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.
Greenland KE, Op de Coul EL, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, Fennema HJ, Götz HM, Hoebe CJ, Koekenbier RH, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, van den Broek IV. Greenland KE, et al. Among authors: van bergen je, van den broek iv, van ravesteijn sm. Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Jun;38(6):467-74. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318204546e. Sex Transm Dis. 2011. PMID: 21217416
Systematic selection of screening participants by risk score in a Chlamydia screening programme is feasible and effective.
van den Broek IV, Brouwers EE, Götz HM, van Bergen JE, Op de Coul EL, Fennema JS, Koekenbier RH, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, Hoebe CJ. van den Broek IV, et al. Among authors: van bergen je, van ravesteijn sm. Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Apr;88(3):205-11. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050219. Epub 2012 Jan 3. Sex Transm Infect. 2012. PMID: 22215696
Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.
Op de Coul EL, Götz HM, van Bergen JE, Fennema JS, Hoebe CJ, Koekenbier RH, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, van der Sande MA, van den Broek IV. Op de Coul EL, et al. Among authors: van bergen je, van den broek iv, van ravesteijn sm, van der sande ma. Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Feb;39(2):97-103. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182383097. Sex Transm Dis. 2012. PMID: 22249297
Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.
Dokkum NF, Koekenbier RH, van den Broek IV, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, Fennema JS, Götz HM, Hoebe CJ, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, Op de Coul EL. Dokkum NF, et al. Among authors: van bergen je, van den broek iv, van ravesteijn sm. BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 9;12:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-176. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22404911 Free PMC article.
High yield of reinfections by home-based automatic rescreening of Chlamydia positives in a large-scale register-based screening programme and determinants of repeat infections.
Götz HM, van den Broek IV, Hoebe CJ, Brouwers EE, Pars LL, Fennema JS, Koekenbier RH, van Ravesteijn S, Op de Coul EL, van Bergen J. Götz HM, et al. Among authors: van ravesteijn s, van den broek iv, van bergen j. Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Feb;89(1):63-9. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050455. Epub 2012 Jun 23. Sex Transm Infect. 2013. PMID: 22728910
Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation.
van den Broek IV, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, Fennema JS, Götz HM, Hoebe CJ, Koekenbier RH, Kretzschmar M, Over EA, Schmid BV, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, van der Sande MA, de Wit GA, Low N, Op de Coul EL. van den Broek IV, et al. Among authors: van bergen je, van ravesteijn sm, van der sande ma. BMJ. 2012 Jul 5;345:e4316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4316. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22767614 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
61 results