Efficacy, reactogenicity, and safety of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine for the prevention of herpes zoster in Chinese adults ≥ 50 years: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2351584. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2351584. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

Abstract

Phase III multi-country studies (ZOE-50/70) demonstrated that the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was well tolerated and prevented herpes zoster (HZ) in healthy ≥ 50-year-olds, with a vaccine efficacy (VE) > 90% across age groups. These pivotal trials did not enroll participants from mainland China where RZV is licensed, therefore similar clinical data are missing for this population. In this phase IV observer-blind study (NCT04869982) conducted between 2021 and 2023 in China, immunocompetent and medically stable ≥ 50-year-olds were randomized 1:1 to receive two RZV or placebo doses, 2 months apart. This study assessed the VE (overall, as confirmatory objective, and descriptively by age category [50-69-year-olds/≥ 70-year-olds]), reactogenicity, and safety of RZV in this Chinese population. Of the 6138 enrolled participants, 99.2% completed the study. During a mean follow-up period of 15.2 (±1.1) months, 31 HZ episodes were confirmed (RZV = 0; placebo = 31) for an incidence rate of 0.0 vs 8.2 per 1000 person-years and an overall VE of 100% (89.82-100). The descriptive VE was 100% (85.29-100) for 50-69-year-olds and 100% (60.90-100) for ≥ 70-year-olds. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the RZV vs the placebo group (median duration: 1-3 days for both groups). Pain and fatigue were the most frequent local and general AEs (RZV: 72.1% and 43.4%; placebo: 9.2% and 5.3%). The frequencies of unsolicited AEs, serious AEs, potential immune-mediated diseases, and deaths were similar between both groups. RZV is well tolerated and efficacious in preventing HZ in Chinese ≥ 50-year-olds, consistent with efficacy studies including worldwide populations with similar age and medical characteristics.

Keywords: Herpes zoster; adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine; reactogenicity; safety; vaccine efficacy.

Plain language summary

What is the context? Herpes zoster, commonly known as shingles, is a painful rash resulting from the reactivation of the dormant virus causing chickenpox.Vaccines preventing shingles, such as Shingrix, were shown to be well tolerated and efficacious in healthy adults over 50 years of age from Europe, North and Latin America, Australia, and Asia (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, Japan).However, data on real-world protective effect of Shingrix are limited in some regions where the vaccine is licensed for use, such as mainland China.What is new? We analyzed data from Chinese adults aged 50 years or older to determine the efficacy and safety of Shingrix.Around 6000 participants were divided in two equal groups to receive two doses of Shingrix or two doses of a placebo, given 2 months apart.We found that, during the study period, the vaccine was 100% efficacious in preventing shingles.We showed that the vaccine had an acceptable safety profile in this Chinese population.What is the impact? Shingrix is efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese adults over 50 years of age, as it is in similarly aged populations from other evaluated regions.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Clinical Trial, Phase IV
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adjuvants, Immunologic / administration & dosage
  • Adjuvants, Immunologic / adverse effects
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • China / epidemiology
  • East Asian People
  • Female
  • Herpes Zoster Vaccine* / administration & dosage
  • Herpes Zoster Vaccine* / adverse effects
  • Herpes Zoster Vaccine* / immunology
  • Herpes Zoster* / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Vaccine Efficacy
  • Vaccines, Synthetic* / administration & dosage
  • Vaccines, Synthetic* / adverse effects
  • Vaccines, Synthetic* / immunology

Substances

  • Herpes Zoster Vaccine
  • Vaccines, Synthetic
  • Adjuvants, Immunologic

Grants and funding

This work was supported by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA covered all costs associated with the development and publishing of the present manuscript.